| Alla Nazimova as Hedda Gabler. |
February 1907 was in most ways an ordinary theatre month in Brooklyn. But it did include some historically extraordinary nuggets among the slag. First, though, it’s necessary to note, again, the critical awareness of a rising tide of progressive dramatic literature--including the increasingly present "problem play"--sloshing on these shores from European influences and sources, Ibsen being preeminent. Brooklyn may not have seen all such advanced plays, but it saw a healthy number under the bylines of Sudermann, Shaw, Hauptmann, and Pinero to satisfy that small but growing segment of the theatergoing public demanding something more substantial than the musical, melodramatic, and farcical pabulum that kept its theatres in business.
Still, almost every production of such foreign dramas, no
matter the encomiums, was a box office failure, passed off by its stars and
producers as a “success d’estime.” What it boiled down to, in fact, was that
these important European plays were never intended to be blockbuster hits with
long runs as per the American and English systems. Instead, they were produced
in the great stock companies of continental Europe, where they appeared perhaps
once or twice a week. Even a week’s run would have been exceedingly rare.
Not understanding this, American managers often attempted to
prime the plays for their audiences by adapting their foreign qualities to
resemble American ones, including transferring the action to this country’s
locales. Producers were preoccupied with worries that the American public would
not understand the plays if only their language was translated. On the
continent, plays from one nation were not so treated when staged in another
country, remaining almost literal translations of their originals. We do not
need such “Americanization,” insisted W.M.O. in the Citizen. “The public
appreciates the tendency to give us the masterpieces of other countries, but
let’s have them whole and unchanged” and audiences will promise to read up on
the subjects involved to be ready to understand them when presented on the
stage.
As will be seen, Americanizing foreign plays was not always
the case, as can be seen from the two Ibsen plays brought to Brooklyn this
month by Russian-born star Alla Nazimova (1879-1945) in her local debut. Nazimova
was a sensation at the time, said to have mastered English in eight months. Her
Nora in A Doll’s House had struck Broadway like a lightning bolt, and her
Hedda Gabler, which challenged that of America’s leading actress, Mrs.
Fiske, was yet another revelation. In contrast to Mrs. Fiske’s very American Hedda,
as noted below, Nazimova’s was imbued with Russian charisma. Here’s a detailed,
slightly critical, description of her performance from the Eagle of
February 26.
Of the many mighty temperamental
women who have come to our stage from Europe, none has brought so exotic a flavor
or has so radiated fascination as does Alla Nazimova. . . . Whether Mme.
Nazimova gives Ibsen’s idea of Hedda is open to grave questions, but there is
no question at all that her embodiment of the character compels interest from
the start, even when one disagrees with it, and there is no question that her
ideal is embodied with the most subtle, delicate and finished art in its finer
shadings, or that it rises to a pitch of commanding tragic power. There is a
thrill about the last act which sends the audience into the street with pulses
tingling, wondering what sort of creature Ibsen intended to portray and
wondering still more vividly what sort of a wonderful creature this Russian
actress may be.
The ideal of Hedda commonly
accepted . . . heretofore is that set before it by Mrs. Fiske, whose Hedda
might have lived in Montclair or the Oranges and been ambitious to enter
society on Fifth Avenue. Mme. Nazimova’s Hedda never lived further west than
Moscow or Odessa and her ancestors came from the land of serpent worship. The
glitter of her eyes suggests the powers of a snake charmer from the first scene
and the sinuous and undulating movements of the long and slender body carry out
that illusion. There never was a woman who made such subtle and effective use
of her body in creating an atmosphere. The devices of costume and the stage
accessories, with the upward gestures and the many small movements, with which
she produces the illusion of unusual height are a proof of remarkable command
over technical resources. The apparent height reinforces the slenderness and
creates the serpent-like atmosphere on which much of the effect of this Hedda
depends.
| Alla Nazimova as Hedda Gabler. |
And with the serpent-like quality
Mme. Nazimova suggests a much greater physical disturbance than we are
accustomed to—or that would thought “nice” were it less subtly done. Beginning
with this suggestion of illness she radiates an impression that Hedda’s nerves
are so thoroughly on edge that she may explode in a fit of hysteria, or even of
insanity, at any moment. The suggestion of mental aberration becomes so strong,
indeed, that her Hedda ceases to be a creature to be explained or altogether understood.
Instead of an extreme example of the modern highly nervous type of woman who
rebels against child bearing, this Hedda becomes an isolated creature to be
judged only by the whims of her own overmastering personality.
The critic goes on to praise her third act scene when Hedda
burns Eilert Lovborg’s manuscript, a scene that rose to “heights of tragic power,
and tragedy is altogether too exalted a word to associate with a character so
thoroughly despicable as Hedda.” Other “big moments” also added greatly to the
play’s “stirring effect,” even if they were not helpful in interpreting Ibsen.
Aside from Mrs. Jacques Martin as Aunt Julia, however, “stood the most
grotesque collection of misfits which ever pretended to ‘support’ a great
actress.” They were John Findlay as Tesman, Dodson Mitchell as Brack; John
Blair as Eilert; and Blanche Stoddard as Mrs. Elvsted.
Other plays of particular interest this month included a return visit of A Millionaire’s Revenge, the first play to exploit the story of the Harry K. Thaw-Stanford White-Evelyn Nesbitt adultery and murder scandal, only months after it was the biggest news. A relatively recent stage treatment was Ragtime (1998). Also returning was Ben-Hur, the spectacular historical melodrama with its famous chariot race; and the latest Rogers Brothers farce, The Rogers Brothers in Ireland, part of a series that began with A Reign of Error in 1898, and was followed by The Rogers Brothers in . . . , those dots replaced in each successive entry by Wall Street, Central Park, Washington, Harvard, London, and Paris, before reaching the Emerald Isle.
Far more significant for serious theatergoers was the highly
lauded new society farce about “progressive divorce” among the horsy set, The
New York Idea, by Langdon Mitchell, one of the most admired American plays
of the decade. Just as important, it starred the great Mrs. Fiske in a
production that drew raves for the excellence of its direction and perfectly
balanced ensemble, in which John Mason and George Arliss played important
roles.
Last month’s blog entry offered examples of melodramatic spectacle
that popped people’s peepers with their pre-CGI special effects. Among this
month’s more memorable visuals was the blizzard created in Owen Davis’s The Confessions
of a Wife at the Columbia. In this scene, hero Oliver Ashmore is traveling
cross country in search of his wife via the Western express when it gets stuck
in a snow drift in wild country. According to the Daily Times of
February 2:
The snow is coming down in streaks.
The wind moans and carries every inanimate and living object in its wake. The
passengers must make the best of their plight in the warmth of the cars. The
engine is literally buried in the snow. It puffs laboriously in an effort to
move ahead, but it is of no use. The scene is so realistically constructed and
worked out that the audience is carried to the highest pitch of excitement.
As for offstage theatrical news in February there was the
crackdown on the posting in public places of show posters considered morally
damaging and likely to corrupt innocent youths. Leading the charge in Brooklyn was
the Allied Women’s Clubs, backed by various rightminded clergymen, physicians,
and other upstanding citizens. Thus was the American Bill Posting Company
summoned to court to answer for itself, while the plaintiffs were prepared to
against allowing “the public exhibition of posters which depict scenes of crime
or immorality.” But this raised the eternally knotty question as to what
constitutes immoral influence in a poster.
February 4-9, 1907
Bijou: (Spooner Stock Company) The Counterfeiters
Blaney’s Amphion: Uncle Tom’s Cabin, with Al W. Martin’s
company
Broadway: Checkers
Columbia: The Confessions of a Wife
Folly: Young Buffalo, King of the Wild West
Grand Opera House: Secret Service Sam, with Charles
T. Aldrich
Majestic: Metz in the Alps, with Al H. Wilson
New Montauk: George Washington, Jr., with George M.
Cohan
Payton’s Lee Avenue: (Lee Avenue Stock Company) Dorothy
Vernon of Haddon Hall, with Etta Reed Payton
Phillips’ Lyceum: (Lyceum Stock Company) She Dared Do
Right
Shubert: The Blue Moon, with James T. Powers
Vaudeville and burlesque: Hyde & Behman’s,
Gotham, Gayety, Keeney’s, Star, Imperial, Novelty
February 11-16, 1907
Bijou: (Spooner Stock Company) Mistress Nell
Blaney’s Amphion: Parted on Her Bridal Tour, with
Victory Bateman
Broadway: 45 Minutes from Broadway, with Fay Templeton
Columbia: The Avenger
Folly: Secret Service Sam, with Charles T. Aldrich
Grand Opera House: A Millionaire’s Revenge
Majestic: His Last Dollar, with David Higgins
New Montauk: The Daughters of Men, with Dorothy
Donnelly
Payton’s Lee Avenue: (Lee Avenue Stock Company) The Cowboy
and the Lady
Phillips’ Lyceum: (Lyceum Stock Company) Lost in a Bad
City
Shubert: The New York Idea, with Minnie Maddern Fiske
Vaudeville and burlesque: Hyde & Behman’s,
Gotham, Gayety, Keeney’s, Star, Imperial, Novelty
February 18-23, 1907
Bijou: (Spooner Stock Company) Death before Dishonor
Blaney’s Amphion: Kidnapped for Revenge
Broadway: Ben-Hur
Columbia: At the World’s Mercy
Folly: Abyssinia, with Williams and Walker
Grand Opera House: Texas
Majestic: Dockstader’s Minstrels
New Montauk: The Aero Club, with Lulu Glaser
Payton’s Lee Avenue: (Lee Avenue Stock Company) A
Daughter of the South, with Etta Reed Payton
Phillips’ Lyceum: (Lyceum Stock Company) The Boy Scout
Shubert: The Earl and the Girl, with Eddie Foy
Vaudeville and burlesque: Hyde & Behman’s,
Gotham, Gayety, Keeney’s, Star, Imperial, Novelty
February 25-March 2, 1907
Bijou: (Spooner Stock Company) The Strange Adventures of Miss Brown
Blaney’s Amphion: The Eyewitness
Broadway: The Squaw Man, with William Faversham, Julie
Opp, W.S. Hart
Columbia: Billy the Kid, with Joseph Santley
Folly: His Last Dollar, with David Higgins
Grand Opera House: No Mother to Guide Her, with Lillian
Mortimer
Majestic: In Old Kentucky
New Montauk: The Rogers
Brothers in Ireland, with the Rogers Brothers
Payton’s Lee Avenue: (Lee Avenue Stock Company) Raffles,
with Etta Reed Payton, Corse Payton
Phillips’ Lyceum: (Lyceum Stock Company) The Waifs of New
York, with N.S. Wood
Shubert: Hedda Gabler, A Doll’s House, Alla Nazimova
Vaudeville and burlesque: Hyde & Behman’s,
Gotham, Gayety, Keeney’s, Star, Imperial, Novelty


.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)






.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)

.jpg)





.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)






.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)


.jpg)
.jpg)





No comments:
Post a Comment