| Minnie Maddern Fiske |
Samuel L. Leiter
For comprehensive background on Brooklyn’s pre-20th-century theatre history please see my book, Brooklyn Takes the Stage: Nineteenth-Century Theater in the City of Churches (McFarland: 2024) and my blog, “Annals of the Brooklyn Stage.” The latter is a week by week description of theatre activity in Brooklyn; obviously, it will expand rather slowly because so much must be described and the present blog will be occupying my attention until live theatre in Brooklyn begins to fade over the early decades of the 20th century, dying out by the 1930s.
The entries in this blog began as annual ones, for 1898 and 1899. Because of the large amount of memory used, which made editing them problematic, subsequent entries were shortened so they covered only several months at a time, but these too needed to be shortened. Thus, beginning with 1901: September, all entries cover a single month. The quickest way to find any of these entries is probably to click on the following link, where links to everything prior to its date are provided:
Links to all of 1902’s posts can be found here.
Links to all of 1903’s posts can be found here.
Links to all of 1904's posts can be found here.
1905: JANUARY
1905: FEBRUARY
1905: MARCH
As we’ve seen, April was the last full month of theatre in pre-airconditioned Brooklyn before the theatres began shutting down for the summer, when the shorefront theatrical attractions would take over. But it was rarely the least, as April 1905 demonstrated, with starring engagements by, for example, Louis Mann, George Sidney, Dave Montgomery and Fred Stone, Maude Adams, George M. Cohan, George Walker and Bert Williams, and Charles Hawtrey, names that have largely faded from household status except for nostalgia-driven buffs.
The Wizard of Oz, still packing them in across the
river, stopped by once more, but novelties (as shows not seen in Brooklyn before
were dubbed) arrived as well, like the elaborate musical Woodland, in
which the characters were birds, and Victor Herbert’s still-performed Babes
in Toyland. As for dramas, little new and/or memorable was shown, revivals taking
the lead, most of disposable quality. There is, though, a certain piquancy in
seeing unrelated plays presented in the course of a single month with titles such
as—if not in this order chronologically—No Wedding Bells for Her, All
For a Woman, How He Won Her, Her First False Step, Deserted
at the Altar, Wedded and Parted, Wedded, but No Wife, Why
He Divorced Her, and Alone in the World. There might even be room in
the group for A Working Girl’s Wrongs.
As for the theatres themselves at this moment of constant construction, renovation, and both name and policy shifts, the major news was the name change of the relatively new Watson’s Cozy Corner at Willoughby and Pearl, near Borough Hall, to the Nassau Theatre, as mentioned in the previous entry. Its new manager, son of the redoubtable producer Oscar Hammerstein I, advertised its aims as “High-Class Vaudeville.” Such terms were occasionally contrived to promote the more fashionable vaudeville bills of the day; soon the borough would be sold on "Advanced Vaudeville," but the shows were never that much different from one another, only the popularity of their acts helping to distinguish one offering from another.
Brooklyn now maintained nine vaudeville and/or
burlesque houses (some doing both), and 12 legitimate theatres with varying but
mostly popular or mid-range prices (and never as expensive as the prime Manhattan
houses). This added up to 21 theatres—more than ever before in the Borough of
Churches.
Business was good enough to make some think even more
theatres could survive amid the growing population. One getting closer to
completion was the so-called New Montauk, to which we’ve already been introduced.
The “old” Montauk was still in business at Flatbush and Fulton, and would avoid
demolition, as we’ll see, thanks to a remarkable engineering feat that moved
its location. But the new structure’s looming presence at Hanover and Livingston,
intended to replace the old one, was closely described in the Standard Union
of April 2. It was noted that the “pure Venetian style” of its frontage was
“novel” for “Long Island,” and that its aura would be that of a “jewel box,” with
a smaller seating capacity than its predecessor, the intention being to
emphasize the intimacy of the relation between stage and audience.
Another issue running through these entries remains the
insidious influence wielded over plays and performers by the Theatrical Syndicate,
with its vise-like grip on what the many theatres under its control across the
nation could present, and how much its artists could be paid. A substantial
piece by Hamilton Ormsbee in the Eagle of April 1 covered much of
the ground. Ormsbee says that the general view of the issue was that it was
all about money, not art. He wants his readers to realize that artists need
nurturing so they can try out their work until such time as it bears fruit when, “after years of nurture and struggle,” they can make a living at it. This
was a point made in a recent magazine interview with great actress Minnie Maddern Fiske, from
which he quotes substantially. She, with David Belasco, was one of the two
remaining anti-syndicate holdouts, both in it for the long haul, with Mrs. Fiske
determined that a free theatre exist in “which the actor shall be free to shape
his own career.” That was something she insisted was impossible under the syndicate
system with its determined reliance on type casting in opposition to versatility.
The bottom line, not creative development, was all that counted.
What the “trust” or syndicate wanted above all, insisted
the star, known not only for her intellect but for her adventurous artistic spirit in those
conservative times, was “sensational newness, with superficiality.” Money ruled
and an actor’s worth was measured by how much a moneymaker he or she was. But you
can’t be a moneymaker without years of hardship as your art develops. Actors
like Edwin Booth and Richard Mansfield would never have survived if they began under
the hands of the trust. And, she declared, only the audience can change these
conditions by demanding what and whom they want to see rather than simply
accepting what the trust decides to feed them.
Ormsbee makes an analogy between the theatre’s growth—with its
thousands of new theatres and the domination of touring combinations—during the
past few decades and the shift from handmade to mass-produced furniture, with
its attendant drop-off in quality and increase in profitability. Trusts arose
in the business world as well as in the theatre, where workers had to create
products to fill those theatres and a well-oiled system like the syndicate was
needed to move those products along with ultimate efficiency. This was in opposition,
of course, to the booking chaos of the past, when actors in mismanaged shows were
commonly left stranded far from home. The old ways led to efficiencies in all
aspects of production, including casting.
But lately, Ormsbee avers, people are seeking handmade
furniture (it was the era of art nouveau), which was providing quality craftsmen
with outlets for their work. Such a tendency seemed to be happening in theatre over
the past few seasons as well, Ormsbee wrote, as theatre artists like Arnold
Daly and Mrs. Fiske had taken risks by producing plays by writers such as Shaw
and Ibsen, among a small number of others challenging the status quo. Realizing
its probable impossibility in America, Ormsbee yearns for theatres that serve
as fulltime stock companies led by eminent actors where considerations of money
and fame are second to artistic quality and joy.
Such, in fact, was essentially what Mrs. Fiske herself reigned
over at the Manhattan Theatre, owned by her husband, Harrison Gray Fiske, where
her more or less permanent company had the freedom to put on limited runs of more
“artistic plays” at special matinees. Barred as she was from so many other cities,
said Ormsbee, she had it within her to gift New York with such a company, whose
success would then be echoed across the nation, “showing what an art theater
may be and thus paving the way to similar establishments elsewhere.”
If you’re wondering what other theatre developments might
have been on people’s minds, here are some things gleaned from the period’s reporting.
First, we can mention the growing status in New York of the Yiddish theatre, not
yet of note in Brooklyn despite a growing population of Jewish immigrants
(Brownsville, for one, was being extensively developed for them). This was pointed
out on April 7 by the Eagle, when an actor named Abramovitch—first name
not given and difficult to uncover—had a funeral procession in Manhattan’s Bowery,
drawing 5,000 people, although he was “entirely unknown outside the ghetto.”
“The English-speaking city knows almost nothing of it, yet
the ghetto [Lower East Side] maintains three Yiddish theaters but supports not
only a colony of actors but dramatists whose plays are written and produced
solely for this public which speaks the Yiddish dialect.” And this leads to why
the Yiddish theatre is mentioned here, which is that “the leader of these
dramatists is Jacob Gordin, who lives in Brooklyn, and writes tragedies which
are played to his compatriots.” His famous plays include a translation of his The
Kreutzer Sonata, a somber work in which Blanche
Walsh toured out West, but had not yet been seen locally.
The article discusses Gordin’s work
approvingly, mentioning stars Jacob Adler and Bertha Kalich. It’s an early
example of the interest soon to be taken by the outside world in the art and
artists of New York’s Yiddish stage, concentrated as it would be for many years
on Second Avenue. “The Yiddish theaters,” concluded the anonymous writer, “afford
a vivid illustration of the cosmopolitanism of New York, and of the high
standard of intellect and intelligence in the Jewish colony.”
Stock companies had boomed at the turn of the century and Brooklyn,
which had only recently had as many as seven such groups, presently had four, the
Spooner Stock Company at the Bijou, the American Stock Company at the Columbia,
the Lee Avenue Stock Company at the Lee Avenue Theatre, and the troupe at
Phillips’ Lyceum, thus giving two such companies to each of the borough’s main districts.
In the Eagle of April 9, a little-known poet and essayist named Lionel Josephare
wrote a delightful but lengthy description of what life in such a company was like,
with lots of Brooklyn examples.
Finally, I am primarily focused on Brooklyn’s legitimate theatre history, even as vaudeville and burlesque continued to metastasize at the legit’s expense; remember, all you need do is look at who was headlining one vaudeville show after the other in the ads posted here and you’ll see at once how common it was for even Broadway’s leading actors to be doing one-act plays on bills with acrobats and dog acts, often making far more money for less work than if they were in a full-scale play or musical.
One
of Brooklyn’s leading vaudeville entrepreneurs, with his own theatres and
circuit, was Percy G. Williams, whose career and position are described in an Eagle article on April 9 (“Vaudeville World Hails Williams as Its Leader”). However,
to repeat those contents here would make this already long entry far
longer than intended.
1. April 3-8, 1905
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bijou: (Spooner Stock Company) The Girl I Left
Behind Me
Broadway: The Second Fiddle, with Louis Mann
Columbia: (American Stock Company) The Octoroon
Folly: Busy Izzy, with George Sidney
Gotham: Her First False Step
Grand Opera House: Terence
Majestic: The Wizard of Oz, with Montgomery and
Stone
Montauk: Woodland
Novelty: The Village Parson
Park: On the Suwanee River
Payton’s Lee Avenue: (Payton’s Lee Avenue Stock
Company) Faust
Phillips’ Lyceum: (Lyceum Stock Company) Why He Divorced
Her
Vaudeville and burlesque: Hyde and Behman’s, Gayety,
Unique, Orpheum, Nassau [changed from Watson’s Cozy Corner], Star, Keeney’s
Fulton Street, Amphion, Garden
2.
April 10-15, 1905
![]() |
Bijou: (Spooner Stock Company) Aristocracy
Broadway: Babes in Toyland
Columbia: (American Stock Company) Faust
Folly: Siberia
Gotham: Queen of the Highway
Grand Opera House: How He Won Her
Majestic: Lew Dockstader’s Minstrels
Montauk: The Little Minister
Novelty: Wedded and Parted
Park: No Wedding Bells for Her
Payton’s Lee Avenue: (Payton’s Lee Avenue Stock
Company) A Texas Steer
Phillips’ Lyceum: (Lyceum Stock Company) Alone in the
World
Vaudeville and burlesque: Hyde and Behman’s, Gayety,
Unique, Orpheum, Nassau, Star, Keeney’s Fulton Street, Amphion, Garden
3.
April 17-22, 1905
Bijou: (Spooner Stock Company) The Wages of Sin
Broadway: Little Johnny Jones, with George M.
Cohan
Columbia: (American Stock Company) All for a Woman
Folly: Desperate Chance
Gotham: The Gypsy Girl, with Dolly Kemper
Grand Opera House: The New Eight Bells
Majestic: In Dahomey, with Williams and Walker
Montauk: Higgledy Piggledy, The College
Widow, with Weber Star Stock Company, Marie Dressler, Trixie Friganza
Novelty: The Span of Life
Park: A Little Outcast
Payton’s Lee Avenue: (Lee Avenue Stock Company) A Royal
Slave, with Corse Payton
Phillips’ Lyceum: (Lyceum Stock Company) Deserted
at the Altar
Vaudeville and burlesque: Hyde and Behman’s, Gayety,
Unique, Orpheum, Watson’s, Star, Keeney’s Fulton Street, Amphion, Garden
4. April 24-29, 1905
![]() |
![]() |
Bijou: (Spooner Stock Company) Jack and the
Beanstalk
Broadway: A Message from Mars, with Charles
Hawtrey
Columbia: (American Stock Company) Dr. Jekyll and
Mr. Hyde
Folly: Wedded, but No Wife, with Selma Herman
Gotham: The Village Parson
Grand Opera House: Sis Hopkins, with Rose
Melville
Majestic: In Dahomey, with Williams and Walker
Montauk: King Richard III, The Misanthrope,
Ivan the Terrible, Beau Brummel, A Parisian Romance, The
Merchant of Venice, Dr. Jekyll, and Mr. Hyde, with Richard
Mansfield
Novelty: Human Hearts
Park: The Curse of Drink
Payton’s Lee Avenue: (Lee Avenue Stock Company) The
Pearl of Savoy
Phillips’ Lyceum: (Lyceum Stock Company) A Working
Girl’s Wrongs
Vaudeville and burlesque: Hyde and Behman’s, Gayety,
Unique, Orpheum, Watson’s, Star, Keeney’s Fulton Street, Amphion, Garden


.jpg)
.jpg)












.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)



.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)









.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)


.jpg)



.jpg)
.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment