Wednesday, June 25, 2025

21. 1902: DECEMBER


William Gillette as Sherlock Holmes.

By 

Samuel L. Leiter

For comprehensive background on Brooklyn’s pre-20th-century theatre history please see my book, Brooklyn Takes the Stage: Nineteenth-Century Theater in the City of Churches (McFarland: 2024) and my blog, “Annals of the Brooklyn Stage.” The latter is a week by week description of theatre activity in Brooklyn; obviously, it will expand rather slowly because so much must be described and the present blog will be occupying my attention until live theatre in Brooklyn begins to fade over the early decades of the 20th century, dying out by the 1930s.

The entries in this blog began as annual ones, for 1898 and 1899. Because of the large amount of memory used, which made editing them problematic, subsequent entries were shortened so they covered only several months at a time, but these too needed to be shortened. Thus, beginning with 1901: September, all entries cover a single month. The quickest way to find any of these entries is probably to click on the following link, where links to everything prior to its date are provided: 1901: DECEMBER 

1902: JANUARY

1902: FEBRUARY

1902: MARCH

1902: APRIL

1902: MAY-AUGUST

1902: SEPTEMBER

1902: OCTOBER

December 1902 was surely the most exciting theatre month of the year in Brooklyn, with more standout activity than can be summed up briefly here. In addition to the usual melodramas, farces, and revivals to which Brooklyn audiences were accustomed, including two revivals of such overdone perennials as Uncle Tom’s Cabin and one of East Lynne, there were visits from historically important actors. Most important were Mrs. Leslie Carter in her overstuffed period costume drama, Du Barry, Henrietta Crosman in hers, The Sword of the King, Mrs. Patrick Campbell in Pinero’s problem drama, The Second Mrs. Tanqueray, Francis Wilson in his musical comedy The Toreador, and, most widely popular of all, William Gillette in his enormously successful adaptation of a play about Arthur Conan Doyle’s master detective, Sherlock Holmes.

On top of that there was the play at the Amphion in which, Cecil Spooner, one of the two sisters admired as leading ladies of Brooklyn’s Spooner Stock Company, had—at the urging of her manager mother, Mrs. Molly Spooner—decided to launch her career as a touring star. Based by Frances Aymar Mathews on her own  novel of the same name, it was called Lady Peggy Goes to Town; so much faith had been put in it that Mrs. Spooner decided to abandon her plans to open a second Brooklyn stock theatre—at the Eastern District’s Amphion—to balance her company at the Western District’s Bijou, and put all her chips behind this venture.

Unfortunately, although possessed of entertaining qualities, it was found by H.D.F. of the Citizen (December 7) to be undramatic, implausible, thematically unoriginal, and filled with old hat situations. It presented the “adventures of Lady Peggy when, disguised in the habiliments of a man, she visits London, fights a duel with her lover, and gets into all sorts of scrapes.” Cecil Spooner, “the winsome little star,” as the Citizen dubbed her, apparently scored as Lady Peggy, and her coming tour remained intact. Clay Meeker Hamilton of the Eagle, who often wrote about managers’ disinterest in new plays, and preference for those with European origins, or by authors with a name to new scripts. was particularly perturbed.        

In his December 7 column, he couldn’t understand a situation in which an experienced novelist, with two previous Spooner-produced plays to her name—the Spooners being highly knowledgeable about what works on stage—could provide a work whose technical problems were so obviously overlooked before it opened. Instead, they allowed it to run two hours longer than expected, both because of excessive dialogue and unnecessarily burdensome scene shifting. The critic insisted that it was a convention that no play should run longer than two and a half to two and three-quarter hours, with half an hour figured in for scene shifting, leaving two to two hours and 15 minutes for action.

Hamilton’s dismantling of the production is too long to recount here in full. He posited the following unanswerable conundrum, which applies, of course, to countless other shows as well. “Why could not the professionals in charge have seen these things as clearly in manuscript as in performance?”

 

A week later, on December 14, Hamilton noted how upset the author’s friends were by his “unjust” critique, especially of its length, which they claimed was not Mathews’s fault but “was the result of revision conducted by or under the order of the Spooners. That may account,” Hamilton said, “for the obvious reluctance of Miss Mathews to bow her acknowledgments to the applause . . . on the opening night, which must have impressed everybody in the theater.” Pressed on why Mathews and her publisher stood by and allowed such damage to be done, a friend answered that she felt it best to let those making the mistake learn by making it and reaping the results, even though she would be the one everyone blamed.

 

However, after returning to her home on Montague Street on opening night, she began making arrangements to pay respected “stage manager” (i.e., director) Eugene W. Presbrey “the small sum of $500” to overhaul the play and production, putting under Presbrey’s “very firm thumb,” “the addenda furnished by Miss Spooner’s friends, the little actress herself, the company, scenery, costumes and properties.” Hamilton certifies this would make the work a success and justify Cecil Spooner’s future as a star. By July 1903, in fact, Cecil Spooner had done well enough with the play to be signed to a contract with syndicate powers Klaw and Erlanger.

 

Hamilton’s other concerns on December 7, more general than Brooklyn-related, were the need for conflict in drama; the debt that writers of the recent flood of rustic dramas owe to the late James A. Herne, author of Sag Harbor, for the authenticity of his writing; and the “pessimism and moral miasma” that taint so much of the new European drama, as limned in a surprisingly erudite essay on Ibsen’s baneful influence on lesser European dramatists by the great American actress, Minnie Maddern Fiske.

 

A week later, Hamilton focused on the Brooklyn stock company revival as exemplified by what was happening at the Columbia, where that venue’s company was being combined with traveling stock stars, which is how early stock companies operated. Actors used to learn their trade in such companies when master actors came to play engagements with them, playing without outside help between such visits. Of the few traveling stars to appreciate the old system, there were such examples as Melbourne McDowell and Elita Proctor Ellis. McDowell, widower of the late star Fanny Davenport, had inherited her scenery and Sardou-heavy repertory (Tosca, Cleopatra, Gismonda, Fedora), which allowed him to bring them with him when playing with the Columbia and other troupes, who couldn’t otherwise afford them, for stays of four to five weeks.

 

On December 21, Hamilton wrote about the fad for theatre that exploited actual sensational crimes, three examples having recently played on Brooklyn’s stages. One, The Great Poison Mystery, was about “the Molineux case,” a miserable flop; another, A Desperate Chance, about “the sensational delivery of the Biddle brothers at Pittsburg,” more effective; and the third not a play but the appearance on the vaudeville stage of 19-year-old Florence Burns, “the woman arrested for the Brooks murder.” Her only stage qualification was her “remarkable beauty,” but her presence was so pitiful you had to feel sorry for her. With such content on the stage, Hamilton wondered, is it any wonder so many still looked with distaste on the stage?

           

On December 21, Hamilton discussed the difficulty of American comic actors in sticking to their characters in farces instead of depending on their reputations for being funny and thereby going for laughs regardless of their relation to the play. English comics, he claimed, remained truer to their material.

           

1.      December 1-6. 1902

Amphion: My Lady Peggy Goes to Town, with Cecil Spooner

Bijou: (Spooner Stock Company) Madame Sans Gene

Blaney’s: (Blaney’s All-Star Stock Company) The Fugitive

Columbia: (Greenwall Stock Company) Secret Service

Folly: The Governor’s Son, with the Four Cohans

Gotham: (Gotham Stock Company) Blow for Blow

Grand Opera House: Are You a Mason?, with John C. Rice, Thomas A. Wise

Montauk: Du Barry, with Mrs. Leslie Carter

Park: Not Guilty

Payton’s: (Payton Theatre Company) The Shaughraun

Phillips’ Lyceum: (Lyceum Stock Company) The Face in the Moonlight

Vaudeville and burlesque: Hyde & Behman’s, Star, Orpheum, Gayety, Unique

1.      December 8-13, 1902

 

Amphion: Quincy Adams Sawyer, with Charles Dixon

Bijou: (Spooner Stock Company) The Still Alarm

Blaney’s: (Blaney’s All-Star Stock Company) The Great Poison Mystery

Columbia: (Greenwall Stock Company) Carmen

Folly: Are You a Mason?, with John C. Rice and Thomas A. Wise

Gotham: (Gotham Stock Company) The Red Barn

Grand Opera House: Alphonse and Gaston

Montauk: Du Barry, with Mrs. Leslie Carter

Park: Uncle Tom’s Cabin

Payton’s: (Payton Theatre Company) Aristocracy

Phillips’ Lyceum: (Lyceum Stock Company) The Man Without a Country

Vaudeville and burlesque: Hyde & Behman’s, Star, Orpheum, Gayety, Unique

2.      December 15-20, 1902

Amphion: The Defender

Bijou: (Spooner Stock Company) East Lynne

Blaney’s: (Blaney’s All-Star Stock Company) In the Heart of the Storm

Columbia: (Greenwall Stock Company) My Friend from India

Folly: Alphonse and Gaston

Gotham: (Gotham Stock Company) The Turn of the Tide

Grand Opera House: A Desperate Chance

Montauk: The Night of the Party

Park: At Cripple Creek

Payton’s: (Payton Theatre Company) A Midnight Folly

Phillips’ Lyceum: (Lyceum Stock Company) Her One Great Sin

Vaudeville and burlesque: Hyde & Behman’s, Star, Orpheum, Gayety, Unique

3.      December 22-27, 1902

Amphion: Robert Emmet, with Brandon Tynan

Bijou: (Spooner Stock Company) A Lady of Quality

Blaney’s: (Blaney’s All-Star Stock Company) The Power of the Cross

Columbia: (Greenwall Stock Company) As You Like It

Folly: A Fight for Millions

Gotham: (Gotham Stock Company) The Slaves of Russia

Grand Opera House: A Prince of Tatters

Montauk: Sherlock Holmes, with William Gillette

Park: The Little Mother

Payton’s: (Payton Theatre Company) Michael Strogoff

Phillips’ Lyceum: (Lyceum Stock Company) Uncle Tom’s Cabin

Vaudeville and burlesque: Hyde & Behman’s, Star, Orpheum, Gayety, Unique

4.      December 29-January 3, 1902

 

Amphion: The Toreador, with Francis Wilson

Bijou: (Spooner Stock Company) Little Lord Fauntleroy

Blaney’s: (Blaney’s All-Star Stock Company) The Strange Adventures of Miss Brown

Brooklyn Academy of Music: The Sword of the King, with Henrietta Crosman

Columbia: (Greenwall Stock Company) Antony and Cleopatra, with Melbourne McDowell, Florence Stone

Folly: A Desperate Chance

Gotham: (Gotham Stock Company) The City of New York

Grand Opera House: Spotless Town

Montauk: The Joy of Living, The Second Mrs. Tanqueray, with Mrs. Patrick Campbell

Park: Eight Bells, with the Byrne Brothers

Payton’s: (Payton Theatre Company) A Milk White Flag

Phillips’ Lyceum: (Lyceum Stock Company) The Queen of Chinatown

Vaudeville and burlesque: Hyde & Behman’s, Star, Orpheum, Gayety, Unique

 


No comments:

Post a Comment

21. 1902: DECEMBER

William Gillette as Sherlock Holmes . By  Samuel L. Leiter For comprehensive background on Brooklyn’s pre-20 th -century theatre histo...